Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Planck reveals 'almost perfect' universe!
Replies: 11   Last Post: Mar 25, 2013 5:28 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Double-A Posts: 42 Registered: 3/2/09
Re: Planck reveals 'almost perfect' universe!
Posted: Mar 23, 2013 7:16 PM

On Mar 23, 1:00 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >"Double-A" <double...@hush.com> wrote in message
> >On Mar 22, 12:19 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >> "Double-A" <double...@hush.com> wrote in message
>
>
> >> > It is the best of all possible universes!
>
> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/mar/21/planck-reveals-a...
>
> >> > Double-A
>
> >> The path from an almost perfect sphere
> >> to the "almost perfect universe.

>
> >> VOLUME
> >> -----------

>
> >> The volume of a perfect sphere is:
> >> volume = 4 / 3 * pi * radius^3

>
> >> If a sphere divides into two equal parts
> >> and there is no "sawdust"
> >> ( No matter is converted into space.)

>
> >> each part would have a volume of
> >> one half of the original volume.

>
> >> A division of an original sphere with a volume of 1.0 volume units,
> >> would create two spheres with volumes of .5 volume units.

>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> SPACE
> >> --------

>
> >> The radius of a perfect sphere is:
> >> radius = ( 3/4 * volume / pi ) ^.3333333

>
> >> The radius of a 1.0 unit sphere is 0.620350491
> >> and the radii of a .5 unit sphere is 0.492372511.

>
> >> The first two spheres from a division would create a space of
> >> 2 * 0.492372511 or 0.984745023
> >> compared to the original space of 0.620350491,
> >> thus the space would be increased by 0.364394531 space units.

>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> LARGE POPULATIONS
> >> ---------------------------

>
> >> The space generate by 1,000,000 divisions would be
> >> 6203.504941 space units.

>
> >> and the space generate by 1,000,001 divisions would be
> >> 6203.509076 space units.

>
> >> As can be seen, as more and more divisions occur,
> >> the creation of space becomes less obvious.

>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> TIME
> >> ------

>
> >> Time and 3D space came about
> >> because an initial amount of action
> >> existed in the universe.

>
> >> The action modulated the rotation of matter,
> >> creating 3D space and time,

>
> >> time being a count of some standard angular displacement.
>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> LUMPS TO SPHERES
> >> ------------------------

>
> >> The division of matter creates non-spherical matter
> >> TEMPORARILY, but Nature uses action
> >> to reduce non-spherical material to perfect spheres.

>
> >> Nature even created animals and man
> >> to help in the process of reducing non-spherical
> >> matter to more perfect spheres.

>
> >> Man makes low places high
> >> and high places low.

>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> SAWDUST
> >> ------------

>
> >> When matter divides,
> >> one or both of two things happen:

>
> >> 1. space increases
> >> 2. the volume of matter decreases

>
> >> Hubble expansion seems to tell us
> >> that space is increasing.

>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> SUMMARY
> >> -------------

>
> >> The bottom line is,
> >> sawdust is created when matter divides,
> >> and the sawdust is space,

>
> >> and time and 3D space
> >> are created by the rotation of matter,

>
> >> which was and is driven by
> >> a fixed amount of action
> >> that existed from the first division.

>
> >> Assuming that the diameter of the universe is 45 billion years,
> >> and that one sphere existed 14 billion years ago,
> >> one can calculate
> >> how much matter has been converted to space over time
> >> how much action exists in the universe,
> >> and approximately how many matter divisions have occurred.

>
> >> The basic formula
> >> that drives the universe is:
> >> radius = ( 3/4 * volume / pi ) ^.3333333

>
> >> The rate at which non-spherical matter
> >> is converted to spherical matter,
> >> is a function of the amount of
> >> action extant in the matter and its' environment,
> >> and on the geometry of the matter,
> >> and this is the next step in the complexity of matter, space, and time.

>
> >> Observe that as divisions occur,
> >> space become more and more homogeneous
> >> due to the "Mixmaster effect" caused by the action,

>
> >> and the action is more evenly distributed to the
> >> increasing number of matter pieces.

>
> >> --
> >> Tom Potter

>
> >>http://the-cloud-machine.tkhttp://tiny.im/390k
>
> >What is all this rambling supposed to be about, Potter?
>
> >Sawdust is good for gardens.  It supposedly keeps the worms out of

>
> >Double-A
>
> Regarding Double-A's question:
> "What is all this rambling supposed to be about, Potter?"
>
> "The path from an almost perfect sphere
> to the "almost perfect universe."
>
> 1. In the beginning was a sphere.
>
> 2. The sphere possessed ACTION.
>
> 3. The action caused the sphere to burst into pieces.
>
> 4. The separation of the pieces is called space.
> < In English >
>
> 5. Each of the pieces that were separated by spaces
> burst and created more pieces and spaces,
>
> 6. Go To #5
>
> The equation for the burst speed of a material is:
>
> V=?(8S/((3+?)?))
>
> Where...
> V is burst speed
> S is ultimate tensile strength
> ? is Poisson's ratio
> ? is density
>
> What would the universe be like
> if the initial sphere had a negative Poisson's ratio?
>
> http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/~lakes/Poisson.html
>
> It would be great if someone wrote a program
> that allowed one to vary the parameters
> of an initial sphere,
> and graphical show what happens.
>
> --
> Tom Potter
>
> http://the-cloud-machine.tkhttp://tiny.im/390k

An "A" for originality. Your theory is much like my new preacher
friend's religious views: one of a kind.

Double-A

Date Subject Author
3/22/13 Tom Potter
3/22/13 Devil with the China Blue Dress
3/22/13 Tom Potter
3/22/13 Double-A
3/22/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/23/13 Tom Potter
3/23/13 Brian Q. Hutchings