In article <Rr2dna_JTfplVNDMnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews.com>, fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 3/23/2013 9:13 AM, WM wrote: > > On 23 Mrz., 15:01, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 23, 2:43 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > >> > >>> On 23 Mrz., 10:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> We both agree that you have not shown that we can > >>>> do something which leaves no lines and does not > >>>> change the union. > >> > >>> No, of course we do not. > >> > >> WH: this does not mean that one can do something > > > > Of course we cannot really do infinite things. This is only an > > abbreviation. > > No. > > Proper mathematics involves doing the work. > > See Markov. > > WM has a "can do" philosophy but a "no can do" > methodology.
In WM's world of WMytheology, any consideration of Zeno's paradoxes must prevent WM from making any sort of motion! --