On 3/24/2013 4:16 AM, WM wrote: > On 23 Mrz., 23:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > >> Inclusion-monotonic set theory? > > No, simply a sequence of inclusion monotonic sets in ordinary set > theory. That is nothing new.
Back to the dance.
You address no other notion of mathematical object. You say it over and over and over again. And, that a collection of sets of natural numbers can be ordered into finite initial segments has nothing to do with the intent to make crayon marks.
Nor, for that matter, does any "ordinary set theory".