On 24 Mrz., 15:09, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 3/24/2013 4:13 AM, WM wrote: > > > On 23 Mrz., 23:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 23, 11:08 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > >>> On 23 Mrz., 21:26, William hHughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> You claim that no finite line of the set changes the union. > > >> There is no single finite line such that the removal of this one line > >> changes the union. > > > This holds for every line and all its predecessors, i.e., for the > > whole potentially infinite set > > Not when you fail to define your terms.
Every definition needs words. Ignorant readers like you have a very limited vocabulary only. But it would be too tedious to express myself in such a primitive way as might be (but that's not sure) understandable by you. Therefore, if you don't understand, stop reading my texts.