In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 24 Mrz., 03:01, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > So the union of any non-empty but finite set of of FISONs is always a > > FISON, but the union of any infinite set of FISONs is always |N, which > > is not a FISON. > > And that is the foolish belief of matheologians, who are incapable of > distinguishing the potentially infinite sequence of natural numbers > from a completed actually infinite set |N that is more than every > FISON.
Potential infiniteness has no reality outside of odd backwaters like Wolkenmuekenheim, and so has no place outside those backwaters.
> There is not the least reason to believe it (and there are many > proofs of the contrary)
There is not the least reason to believe a merely potential infiniteness that is not an actual finiteness.
> > Fortunately matheology has not yet conquered every domain out of my > lecture hall, but I must confess, in contemporary mathematics the > majority believes in matheology.
That WM is allowed to preach his false gospel in a state school is shameful. --