Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Half Measure
Replies: 14   Last Post: Mar 25, 2013 5:03 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Butch Malahide Posts: 894 Registered: 6/29/05
Re: Half Measure and Correction
Posted: Mar 24, 2013 4:55 PM

On Mar 24, 1:49 pm, David C. Ullrich <ullr...@math.okstate.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:37:46 -0700 (PDT), Butch Malahide
> > <fred.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 24, 10:53 am, David C. Ullrich <ullr...@math.okstate.edu>
> >wrote:

> >> [. . .]
> >> So the more interesting version of the question,
> >> in any case less trivial, amounts to this: Is there
> >> a measurable set D such that

>
> >> 0 < m(D intersect I) < m(I)
>
> >> for every open interval I,
>
> >Didn't we just have that thread?
>
> Yes.
>

>
> >> and such that m(D intersect [0,1]) = 1/2 ?
>
> >OK, that's different.
>
> Precisely! heh.

But not so very different, is it? Let D be a measurable set such that
0 < m(D intersect I) < m(I) for every interval I. It will suffice to
find an interval I such that m(D intersect I)/m(I) = 1/2. Since m(D) >
0, there is an interval J such that m(D intersect J)/m(J) > 1/2;
likewise, since m{R\D) > 0, there is an interval H such that m(D
intersect H)/m(H) < 1/2. Since the function f(a,b) = m(D intersect
(a,b))/(b-a) is continuous on the connected domain {(a,b): a < b},
there is an interval I = (a,b) such that f(a,b) = 1/2.

Date Subject Author
3/23/13 William Elliot
3/23/13 Mike Terry
3/23/13 William Elliot
3/24/13 quasi
3/24/13 Butch Malahide
3/24/13 quasi
3/24/13 quasi
3/24/13 David C. Ullrich
3/24/13 Butch Malahide
3/24/13 David C. Ullrich
3/24/13 Butch Malahide
3/25/13 David C. Ullrich
3/25/13 JT
3/25/13 JT
3/25/13 JT