In article <37351761-5e10-48f4-8089-0197670ebe95@m12g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 24 Mrz., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > A binary tree that contains only "all finite paths" cannot exist, > > The set of all finite paths does not exist?
A set of all finite paths can exist without being a binary tree
> Neither does the set of > all rational numbers, I presume?
As usual WM presumes beyond his undersatnding.
> If you construct it, up to a certain > point, suddenly all reals are there. A fascinating position.
