Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Planck reveals 'almost perfect' universe!
Replies: 11   Last Post: Mar 25, 2013 5:28 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Tom Potter Posts: 497 Registered: 8/9/06
Re: Planck reveals 'almost perfect' universe!
Posted: Mar 25, 2013 6:07 AM

"Double-A" <double-a3@hush.com> wrote in message
>On Mar 23, 1:00 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Double-A" <double...@hush.com> wrote in message
>> >On Mar 22, 12:19 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> >> "Double-A" <double...@hush.com> wrote in message
>>
>>
>> >> > It is the best of all possible universes!
>>
>> >> >http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/mar/21/planck-reveals-a...
>>
>> >> > Double-A
>>
>> >> The path from an almost perfect sphere
>> >> to the "almost perfect universe.

>>
>> >> VOLUME
>> >> -----------

>>
>> >> The volume of a perfect sphere is:
>> >> volume = 4 / 3 * pi * radius^3

>>
>> >> If a sphere divides into two equal parts
>> >> and there is no "sawdust"
>> >> ( No matter is converted into space.)

>>
>> >> each part would have a volume of
>> >> one half of the original volume.

>>
>> >> A division of an original sphere with a volume of 1.0 volume units,
>> >> would create two spheres with volumes of .5 volume units.

>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> SPACE
>> >> --------

>>
>> >> The radius of a perfect sphere is:
>> >> radius = ( 3/4 * volume / pi ) ^.3333333

>>
>> >> The radius of a 1.0 unit sphere is 0.620350491
>> >> and the radii of a .5 unit sphere is 0.492372511.

>>
>> >> The first two spheres from a division would create a space of
>> >> 2 * 0.492372511 or 0.984745023
>> >> compared to the original space of 0.620350491,
>> >> thus the space would be increased by 0.364394531 space units.

>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> LARGE POPULATIONS
>> >> ---------------------------

>>
>> >> The space generate by 1,000,000 divisions would be
>> >> 6203.504941 space units.

>>
>> >> and the space generate by 1,000,001 divisions would be
>> >> 6203.509076 space units.

>>
>> >> As can be seen, as more and more divisions occur,
>> >> the creation of space becomes less obvious.

>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> TIME
>> >> ------

>>
>> >> Time and 3D space came about
>> >> because an initial amount of action
>> >> existed in the universe.

>>
>> >> The action modulated the rotation of matter,
>> >> creating 3D space and time,

>>
>> >> time being a count of some standard angular displacement.
>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> LUMPS TO SPHERES
>> >> ------------------------

>>
>> >> The division of matter creates non-spherical matter
>> >> TEMPORARILY, but Nature uses action
>> >> to reduce non-spherical material to perfect spheres.

>>
>> >> Nature even created animals and man
>> >> to help in the process of reducing non-spherical
>> >> matter to more perfect spheres.

>>
>> >> Man makes low places high
>> >> and high places low.

>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> SAWDUST
>> >> ------------

>>
>> >> When matter divides,
>> >> one or both of two things happen:

>>
>> >> 1. space increases
>> >> 2. the volume of matter decreases

>>
>> >> Hubble expansion seems to tell us
>> >> that space is increasing.

>>
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> SUMMARY
>> >> -------------

>>
>> >> The bottom line is,
>> >> sawdust is created when matter divides,
>> >> and the sawdust is space,

>>
>> >> and time and 3D space
>> >> are created by the rotation of matter,

>>
>> >> which was and is driven by
>> >> a fixed amount of action
>> >> that existed from the first division.

>>
>> >> Assuming that the diameter of the universe is 45 billion years,
>> >> and that one sphere existed 14 billion years ago,
>> >> one can calculate
>> >> how much matter has been converted to space over time
>> >> how much action exists in the universe,
>> >> and approximately how many matter divisions have occurred.

>>
>> >> The basic formula
>> >> that drives the universe is:
>> >> radius = ( 3/4 * volume / pi ) ^.3333333

>>
>> >> The rate at which non-spherical matter
>> >> is converted to spherical matter,
>> >> is a function of the amount of
>> >> action extant in the matter and its' environment,
>> >> and on the geometry of the matter,
>> >> and this is the next step in the complexity of matter, space, and
>> >> time.

>>
>> >> Observe that as divisions occur,
>> >> space become more and more homogeneous
>> >> due to the "Mixmaster effect" caused by the action,

>>
>> >> and the action is more evenly distributed to the
>> >> increasing number of matter pieces.

>>
>> >> --
>> >> Tom Potter

>>
>> >>http://the-cloud-machine.tkhttp://tiny.im/390k
>>
>> >What is all this rambling supposed to be about, Potter?
>>
>> >Sawdust is good for gardens. It supposedly keeps the worms out of

>>
>> >Double-A
>>
>> Regarding Double-A's question:
>> "What is all this rambling supposed to be about, Potter?"
>>
>> "The path from an almost perfect sphere
>> to the "almost perfect universe."
>>
>> 1. In the beginning was a sphere.
>>
>> 2. The sphere possessed ACTION.
>>
>> 3. The action caused the sphere to burst into pieces.
>>
>> 4. The separation of the pieces is called space.
>> < In English >
>>
>> 5. Each of the pieces that were separated by spaces
>> burst and created more pieces and spaces,
>>
>> 6. Go To #5
>>
>> The equation for the burst speed of a material is:
>>
>> V=?(8S/((3+?)?))
>>
>> Where...
>> V is burst speed
>> S is ultimate tensile strength
>> ? is Poisson's ratio
>> ? is density
>>
>> What would the universe be like
>> if the initial sphere had a negative Poisson's ratio?
>>
>> http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/~lakes/Poisson.html
>>
>> It would be great if someone wrote a program
>> that allowed one to vary the parameters
>> of an initial sphere,
>> and graphical show what happens.
>>
>> --
>> Tom Potter
>>
>> http://the-cloud-machine.tkhttp://tiny.im/390k

>
>
>An "A" for originality. Your theory is much like my new preacher
>friend's religious views: one of a kind.
>
>Double-A

It is interesting to see that my pal "Double-A"
has a friend who has a theory much like the one
I outlined above.

As I am always anxious to learn new things
and see if they can improve my understanding of the world,

and will be looking forward to seeing "Double-A"'s
outline of it, using maths as I have done,

and to hear how it compares to the
theory outlined above.

It may be that "Double-A" confuses quasi-random
verbal explanations with linear maths explanations
but we will be able to see when "Double-A"
explains this theory, as he understands it.

Or it may be that "Double-A"
does not understand either theory very well
and will not be able to explain and compare them.

Or it may be that "Double-A"
is just making noise like an empty drum.

--
Tom Potter

http://the-cloud-machine.tk
http://tiny.im/390k

Date Subject Author
3/22/13 Tom Potter
3/22/13 Devil with the China Blue Dress
3/22/13 Tom Potter
3/22/13 Double-A
3/22/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/23/13 Tom Potter
3/23/13 Brian Q. Hutchings