
Re: name for definition in group theory
Posted:
Mar 25, 2013 9:09 AM


On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:42:46 0600, "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@math.ohiostate.edu.invalid> wrote:
>In article <m89uk8lshngii7afp7qktplg90ubnq9doj@4ax.com>, David C. >Ullrich <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote: > >> A topological group is > >Now there is overkill for you.
Yes. First thing I thought of was using some sort of structure theorem. But I don't know any such theorems. Then I realized that the Pontryagin Duality Theorem was in fact a sort of structuure theorem that would suffice, and I rushed into print.
I _did_ follow up with an elementary argument...

