On 3/25/2013 3:03 AM, WM wrote: > On 24 Mrz., 23:37, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 3/24/2013 5:01 PM, WM wrote: >> >>> On 24 Mrz., 22:44, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> >>>> The fact of the matter is this: you do not know >>>> enough mathematics to do these things. >> >>> On 24 Mrz., 22:44, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> >>>> The fact of the matter is this: you do not know >>>> enough mathematics to do these things. >> >>> A failed candídate of mathematics is certainly not in the position to >>> judge. >> >> You are confused. >> > You are confused. Here in sci.logic, you have proved unable to > understand Zermelo's axiom of choice, even in the English translation. > But you have not hesitated to aske me whether I could write the > axioms. If you could understand German, you could read them in my > books. But since you probably would not understand either, there is no > necessity for you to learn German. You are an impertinent fool and big > mouth. I have no reason to answer to any of you further blatherings.
Shall we revisit all of your theories concerning the meaning of names?
Whatever deficiencies I have are from not being immersed in the subject matter of mathematics for a long, long time. My errors and my attitude toward those errors reflect that fact.
Your errors -- such as the misrepresentation of fact in your statement above -- derive from the attempt to treat mathematics as a moral crusade that justifies the rewriting of its history.
And, we await your statement of the axioms as requested. Feel free to fill in the blanks.