Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 231
Replies: 9   Last Post: Mar 25, 2013 5:42 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 14,964
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 231
Posted: Mar 25, 2013 1:31 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 25 Mrz., 17:14, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 5:24 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

> > Matheology § 231
>
> > One philosophically important way in which numbers and sets, as they
> > are naively understood, differ is that numbers are physically
> > instantiated in a way that sets are not. Five apples are an instance
> > of the number 5 and a pair of shoes is an instance of the number 2,
> > but there is nothing obvious that we can analogously point to as an
> > instance of, say, the set {{/0}}.
> > [Nik Weaver: "Is set theory indispensable?"]http://www.math.wustl.edu/~nweaver/indisp.pdf

>
> A link that actually works:http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1680http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Weaver_N/0/1/0/all/0/1


Thanks!

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.