On 3/25/2013 4:22 PM, WM wrote: > No. Alas, I see that all elements that you name can be proved to be > not necessary, so you name only unnecessary elements, believing that > infinitely many will do what none of them does. You must really have > lost touch with rational thinking to argue in that manner.
It is not about "believing".
It is not about "doing".
It is about defined formation rules, defined transformation rules, and sentences expressed in relation to those rules.