fom
Posts:
1,969
Registered:
12/4/12


Re: Matheology § 233
Posted:
Mar 28, 2013 2:15 PM


On 3/28/2013 7:48 AM, WM wrote: > On 28 Mrz., 02:54, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: >> In article >> <32f47105a87344a0bbccf744d1e71...@k1g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, >> >> WM <mueck...@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote: >>> On 27 Mrz., 18:26, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: >> >>>> IF a decimal tree containing a different path for every possible finite >>>> decimal from 0 to 1 exists, it also must contain a path for every real >>>> from 0 to 1. >> >>> And what says matheology about the existence of the set of every >>> possible finite decimal path of the unit interval without any tree >>> structure? >> >> Since WM is the only one speaking for matheology, he must answer his own >> question. > > Matheology is the teaching of unnameable names and of actually > infinite decimal farctions that nobody can apply (opposite to > countably many names which define potentially infinite decimal > expansions). That religion is not what I adhere to.
And, because your world view is cast in terms of religious belief, you make yourself incapable to understand the nature of logic or how it is applied in the profession of mathematics.

