The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 233
Replies: 37   Last Post: May 12, 2014 10:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted: Mar 28, 2013 2:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 3/28/2013 7:48 AM, WM wrote:
> On 28 Mrz., 02:54, Virgil <> wrote:
>> In article
>> <>,
>> WM <> wrote:

>>> On 27 Mrz., 18:26, Virgil <> wrote:
>>>> IF a decimal tree containing a different path for every possible finite
>>>> decimal from 0 to 1 exists, it also must contain a path for every real
>>>> from 0 to 1.

>>> And what says matheology about the existence of the set of every
>>> possible finite decimal path of the unit interval without any tree
>>> structure?

>> Since WM is the only one speaking for matheology, he must answer his own
>> question.

> Matheology is the teaching of unnameable names and of actually
> infinite decimal farctions that nobody can apply (opposite to
> countably many names which define potentially infinite decimal
> expansions). That religion is not what I adhere to.


>>>> So that if WM denies existence of paths for those reals, he
>>>> automatically also denies the existence of any such trees.

>>> I ask: What can be concluded, IF such a tree exists?
> And the foundation of matheology is that such a node-complete tree
> exists since the actually infinite set of all finite decimal
> expansions exist, namely the set of all rationals that end in a
> decimal period 000...

Neither your questions nor your crayon marks constitute

Aristotle is clear about the nature and use of categorical
quantifiers in demonstrations using a deductive calculus.

The development of mathematics is intimately bound with the
not-so-definite theories of science that you pretend would
fix mathematics. Complaints such as yours span the entire
history of mathematics and every repair to the system of
mathematical thought in response to those criticisms breeds
a new generation of loudmouths such as yourself.

As noted before, Berkeley's complaints about Newton's fluxions
provide the fodder for your complaints about Cantor's transfinite

All of your questions demonstrate the same two things: ignorance
of logic and ignorance of mathematics.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.