Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


fom
Posts:
1,968
Registered:
12/4/12


Re: My final formal answer as to what classes are and what class membership is!
Posted:
Mar 28, 2013 3:27 PM


On 3/28/2013 2:02 PM, Zuhair wrote: > See: http://zaljohar.tripod.com/sets.txt > > Philosophical debate about the nature of sets would become a debate > about the > nature of naming procedures.
Well, there is this:
news://news.giganews.com:119/5bidnemPpsnq13zNnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@giganews.com
Or scroll down to "alternate model theoretic considerations" at the web link:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/sci.math/1TZkxMwhmnQ/Wzuw3qZRGCwJ
And, then there is this:
news://news.giganews.com:119/1JidnfVSmpdhudnMnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@giganews.com
with a web link at
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sci.math/yuiwAimW6I4
How many ways can I fail to get a discussion of what I have been trying to explain?
:)
The identity relation on the domain of Zermelo's description in 1908 is framed in terms of denotation and the history of the subject is intimately bound to the history of description theory.
And, there is nothing philosophical about it.
It speaks directly to the model theory of set theory and how the practitioners of the subject changed the scope of the problem without realizing that they had done so.
news://news.giganews.com:119/toidnaS2m_2Ng9XMnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@giganews.com
news://news.giganews.com:119/qaOdneOu3bDWC9XMnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@giganews.com
No useful web link for these. They are buried in a long thread with lots of rambling replies.



