The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 233
Replies: 37   Last Post: May 12, 2014 10:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted: Mar 28, 2013 3:34 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 3/28/2013 2:13 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> <>,
> WM <> wrote:

>> And the foundation of matheology is that such a node-complete tree
>> exists since the actually infinite set of all finite decimal
>> expansions exist, namely the set of all rationals that end in a
>> decimal period 000...

> It is WM who claims that such a tree with a path for each rational must
> exist, even though it requires the actualness of an infinity, which WM
> claims does not exist..
> Standard mathematics only says what must follow IF it exists.

Religious zealotry precludes understanding such distinctions.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.