The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 233
Replies: 37   Last Post: May 12, 2014 10:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
rt servo

Posts: 19
Registered: 2/1/05
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted: Mar 28, 2013 3:46 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 28/03/2013 3:38 PM, fom wrote:
> On 3/28/2013 7:48 AM, WM wrote:
>> If the set of all rationals exists, then that limit exists already in
>> that set. Combining paths with loss of nodes is not useful to increase
>> the number of paths.

> But no one is talking about whether the sequence
> of rationals converging to a rational is in the
> set of rationals.
> The issue is a representation of apparent geometric
> completeness within an arithmetical system.

I don't think so. I think the issue is that Mueckenheim, whom someone
decided to hire as a professor of mathematics at a third-rate
institution, manages to obfuscate just enough the distinction between
repeating and non-repeating decimals when he applies them to paths, and
that he is too dense to comprehend that. Crayon marks, indeed.

> The issue is the logical form of such a construction.
> That you believe your crayon marks justify a material
> belief in some abstract, non-material objects but deny
> a material belief in other abstract, non-material
> objects verges on sheer lunacy.
> Crayon marks have nothing to do with it.
> Belief has nothing to do with it.
> And, your ability to call certain crayon marks "names"
> has nothing to do with it either. You failed your
> science lesson on those days too.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.