Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology � 233
Replies: 37   Last Post: May 12, 2014 10:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 233
Posted: Mar 30, 2013 5:33 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <ff6dnb5sjeDL1crMnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@giganews.com>,
fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote:

> On 3/30/2013 8:38 AM, WM wrote:
> > On 29 Mrz., 19:34, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> >

> >>
> >>> So we have established the fact that an irrational number has no node
> >>> of its own.

> >>
> >> No number in any infinite binary tree has any node "of its own", as
> >> every node has two child nodes belonging to necessarily different
> >> numbers.

> >
> > That is correct, but only establishes the fact that no actually
> > infinite path can be distinguished from all rational paths as should
> > be possible in a Cantor-list - but is not.
> >

> WM failed the science lesson again today.
> The Cantor argument is an argument scheme.
> It presupposes a standard, classical use of
> of the quantifier "all".
> WM has never defined his non-standard uses
> for the word "all". It has no agreed upon
> usage. It is meaningless by WM's own standards
> of meaning through pragmatic agreements between
> language users.
> By definition, all paths in the complete infinite
> binary tree are infinite whether or not they
> become eventually constant.
> Any purported countable listing of all the paths
> of that tree will result in a successful
> defeat of the claim by a Cantor argument.

It would if there were one, which there isn't!

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2016. All Rights Reserved.