The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 224
Replies: 9   Last Post: Mar 31, 2013 1:08 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 2,720
Registered: 2/15/09
Re: Matheology § 224
Posted: Mar 30, 2013 9:39 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 30, 6:10 pm, Virgil <> wrote:
> In article
> <>,
>  "Ross A. Finlayson" <> wrote:

> > "Nothing" has value to some.
> But Ross's nothings do nothing for me.
> --

No, heh, they don't. No they don't.

And while sci.math is a poor medium for mathematical exchange, still
there are many who can see these simple truisms for what they are:
observations of inference, and deduction, of our mutually defined
structures, in the mathematics.

So, I then definitely recommend that those interested in mathematical
foundations of our numbers draw a line before proving they can't.

Then, Hancher, you revel in finding perceived fault in others, where's
your input? I'm only interested in the objective, thank you.


Ross Finlayson

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.