The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 224
Replies: 9   Last Post: Mar 31, 2013 1:08 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 224
Posted: Mar 30, 2013 10:30 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 3/30/2013 6:12 PM, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2:31 pm, Virgil <> wrote:
>> In article
>> <>,
>> "Ross A. Finlayson" <> wrote:

>>> On Mar 27, 8:06 am, "Ross A. Finlayson" <>
>>> wrote:

>> Ross citing himself brought nothing of value to anything.
>> --

> "Nothing" has value to some. Here that's a simple reference to the
> void and epistemological content of "Nothing".
> Then, I ask again: what _value_ have transfinite cardinals, in terms
> of application? Beyond the abstract and that pure mathematics is
> justified for itself: where is the natural placement of modern
> mathematics: for natural physics.
> The answer as of yet is "none".
> So, I can well see where's your "proof" (vis-a-vis truth in theory):
> where's your "use"? What arises from cites of transfinite cardinals,
> except, more of same?
> Then, I can also well see that Hancher ignores presentation he doesn't
> like and can't attack: so for the rest of us, if you would, in any
> manner you see fit: draw a line.
> Draw a line, are the points in order? Draw a line, is each but the
> first and last exactly defined by some previous and some following,
> even penultimate and next? Draw a line, is each defined by beginning
> and end?
> Draw a line: is that uncountably many actions, or just one? For the
> infinitely many points on that line justly drawn from a point: are
> there countably many of them, or more than there are?
> Because, there are certainly only countably many of them in a row.

When the mathematicians drew lines, the critics
did not like the lines that could be drawn.

When the mathematicians invoked infinitesimals,
the critics did not like the infinitesimals that
they could not see.

When the mathematicians invoked approximations,
the critics did not like the incompleteness where
numbers might be missed.

When the mathematicians invoked completeness,
the critics did not like the infinity of
unmissed numbers.

When the critics complain about infinity,

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.