
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted:
Apr 1, 2013 5:51 AM


On 31 Mrz., 19:15, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > This was the question: In a list containing every rational: Is there > > > > always, i.e., up to every digit, an infinite set of paths (rational > > > > numbers) identical with the antidiagonal? Yes or no? > > > > This is an equally valid question: What's the difference between a duck? > > > From the standpoint of matheology, perhaps. > > From the standpoint of logic and common sense, undoubtdly. > > Your question makes no sense
> > > Did you hitherto respond > > in an unreasonable way because you misunderstood the question? > > Your questions assume conditions contrary to fact.
You do not believe that a sequence or list of all rational numbers can be constructed? Or do you not believe that the first n digits of all these numbers in decimal representation can be compared with the first n digits of the antidiagonal number? Or is there something else you do not understand?
Regards, WM

