The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 233
Replies: 37   Last Post: May 12, 2014 10:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted: Apr 1, 2013 5:51 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 31 Mrz., 19:15, Virgil <> wrote:

> > > > This was the question: In a list containing every rational: Is there
> > > > always, i.e., up to every digit, an infinite set of paths (rational
> > > > numbers) identical with the anti-diagonal? Yes or no?

> > > This is an equally valid question: What's the difference between a duck?
> > From the standpoint of matheology, perhaps.
> From the standpoint of logic and common sense, undoubtdly.
> Your question makes no sense

> > Did you hitherto respond
> > in an unreasonable way because you misunderstood the question?

> Your questions assume conditions contrary to fact.

You do not believe that a sequence or list of all rational numbers can
be constructed? Or do you not believe that the first n digits of all
these numbers in decimal representation can be compared with the first
n digits of the anti-diagonal number? Or is there something else you
do not understand?

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.