On 4/1/2013 3:43 PM, david petry wrote: > On Monday, April 1, 2013 1:26:45 PM UTC-7, Dan wrote: > >> I hold no liking for set theory , in its current form . CH may as well >> be meaningless. However , the transfinite hierarchy , everything >> including second order arithmetic and complex analysis are >> unambiguous . I see no reason why we should give it up on a whim . > > Let me restate the basic point I've been making. > > Falsifiability is part of our natural thinking > processes even if we don't always recognize it as such.
Hence, a non-falsifiable theory about material parts of the material universe.