Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Re: Direct Instruction rocks: Or does it?
Replies: 1   Last Post: Apr 2, 2013 1:09 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Richard Hake

Posts: 1,233
From: Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: Direct Instruction rocks: Or does it?
Posted: Apr 1, 2013 10:29 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (4.6 K)

Some subscribers to Math-Teach might be interested in a recent essay
"Re: Direct Instruction rocks: Or does it?" [Hake (2013b)]. The
abstract reads:

**************************************************
ABSTRACT: The conclusion of my response "Direct Instruction rocks: Or
does it?" [Hake (2013a)] at <http://bit.ly/10k3iN3> to David Klahr's
(2012) "Inquiry Science rocks: Or does it?" at <http://bit.ly/WmqHMj>
is (see the complete post for the references):

"A. Klahr's (2012) Fig. 1 histogram and the research of Chen & Klahr
(1999) and Klahr & Nigam (2004) suggest that if one's goal is the
enhancement of a process skill such as the "Control of Variables
Strategy" (CVS) among elementary-school students then (s)he should
probably consider utilizing Klahr's direct-instruction-like
"Training-Probe (TP)" pedagogy rather than discovery-learning-like
"No Training - No Probe (NTNP)" method with near zero teacher
guidance.

B. Hake's (2012) Fig. 1 [histogram taken Hake (1998a)], its
corroboration by others listed in Hake (2008), and the high positive
correlation of post-test conceptual FCI and problem-solving MB tests,
suggest that if one's goal is the enhancement of conceptual
understanding and problem-solving ability among high-school or
undergraduate students then (s)he should probably consider utilizing
discovery-learning-like "Interactive Engagement" pedagogy rather than
direct-instruction-like 'Traditional' pedagogy."
**************************************************

To access the complete 11 kB post please click on <http://yhoo.it/10qf8Wa>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: <http://bit.ly/a6M5y0>
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: <http://bit.ly/9nGd3M>
Academia: <http://bit.ly/a8ixxm>
Blog: <http://bit.ly/9yGsXh>
GooglePlus: <http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE>
Google Scholar <http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3>
Twitter: <http://bit.ly/juvd52>
Facebook: <http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm>

REFERENCES [URL's shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 01April 2013.]

Hake, R.R. 2013a. "Direct Instruction rocks: Or does it?" APS News
22(4), April, online at <http://bit.ly/10k3iN3>. [Response to Klahr
(2012).]

Hake, R.R. 2013b. "Re: Direct Instruction rocks: Or does it?" online
on the OPEN Net-Gold archives at <http://yhoo.it/10qf8Wa>. Post of 01
April 16:00 -0700 to Net-Gold, AERA-K, and AERA-L. Evidently due to a
change in LISTSERV software AERA-K and AERA-L no longer carry *HOT*
Links such as those on Net-Gold! The abstract and link to the
complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and
are on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <http://bit.ly/179X5bA> with a
provision for comments.

Klahr, D. 2012. "Inquiry Science rocks: Or does it?" APS News 21(11),
December; online at <http://bit.ly/WmqHMj>.






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.