david petry <email@example.com> writes:
> On Monday, April 1, 2013 8:16:13 AM UTC-7, AMiews wrote: > >> Uniqueness in Real Probability > >> M. Bernoulli, L. Z. Euler and Amy Mousehead > >> Abstract > >> Let us suppose we are given a path !. In , the authors described Noether, >> partially Deligne, > > [...] > > I'll get right to the point. The scores of goose-stepping sciolists > who comprise Dr. AMiews's Praetorian Guard must all be held > accountable for helping AMiews exploit the masses. I want to share > this with you because if you think that puzzleheaded loan sharks > should be given absolute authority to heat the cauldron of terror > until it boils over into our daily lives, then think again. He has > secretly been promoting the sort of behavior that would have made > the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush. This is, of course, a scandal > and demands a thorough investigation, which I intend to conduct. I > expect to find that knowledge and wisdom are AMiews's enemies. He > understands that by limiting education and enlightenment, he can > fool more people into believing that there is an international > Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily > fluids. Sadly, those with the least education are those who would > benefit most from the knowledge that everything I've said so far is > by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this > letter. My key point is that AMiews can't possibly believe that > doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or > liberty. He's conniving but he's not that conniving.
> The very genesis of AMiews's disruptive personal attacks is in > cynicism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice > that he will eventually himself be destroyed by cynicism. AMiews > presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they > want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to combine, > in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for > lying. If he can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be > laughed out of them. If he can't be argued out of his selfishness, > he must be shamed out of it. If anyone should propose a practical > scheme for providing you with vital information that AMiews has gone > to great lengths to prevent you from discovering, I should be quite > disposed to incur almost any degree of expense to accomplish that > object. In the meantime, let me point out that AMiews contends that > one hallmark of an advanced culture is the rejection of rationalism > and that, therefore, violence and prejudice are funny. This bizarre > pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it > convinces liberticidal perjurers (as distinct from the disrespectful > heinsbies who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in > Nephelococcygia) that we should all bear the brunt of AMiews's > actions. In reality, contrariwise, AMiews's grand plan is to ignore > compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. I'm sure Mao Tse > Tung would approve. In any case, AMiews can't attack my ideas, so he > attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could control, > manipulate, and harm other people.
> I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making > "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a > statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see > a statistical study of AMiews's capacity to learn the obvious. Also > worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many ill-natured > tossers realize that AMiews's propinquity to aberrant cretins leads > him to prime the pump of presentism. (The merits of his ruminations > won't be discussed here because they lack merit.) AMiews has stated > that he acts in the public interest. One clear inference from that > statement--an inference that is never really disavowed--is that > deconstructionism is the catholicon for all the world's ills. Now > that's just ultra-ignominious. We must challenge the present and > enrich the future. We must take action. And we must get the facts > out in the hope that somebody else will do something to solve the > problem. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living > credo.
Wow. Is this really Petry's screed? It seems rather more illucid and, well, frothy than usual.
Ah, wait. It was written on April Fools' Day. I suppose that explains it.
Anyway, I really like the term "ultra-ignominious".
-- Jesse F. Hughes "I'm ruler", said Yertle, "of all that I see. But I don't see enough. That's the trouble with me." -- Yertle the Turtle, by Dr. Suess