Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: Uniqueness in Real Probability
Posted:
Apr 2, 2013 5:46 PM


"david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:9f61373217324f3fb618ff6539182a4c@googlegroups.com... On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 9:17:00 AM UTC7, AMiews wrote:
> PETRYIST DISGUST
> Every product of disgust that is capable of becoming a negation of the > family is: > PETRY;
> protest with the fists of one's whole being in destructive action: > PETRY;
> acquaintance with all the means hitherto rejected by the sexual > prudishness > of easy compromise and good manners: > PETRY;
> abolition of logic, dance of those who are incapable of creation: > PETRY;
>Hey, I resemble that! > >I actually don't get it. Just so there's no misunderstanding, let me >explain. > >I assumed that the silly math article posted by AMiews was "written" by >Mathgen or some other nonsense text generator and posted as an April >Fools >prank. So in response, I used Scott Pakin's Complaint Letter Generator as >a way to participate in the prank. > >http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ > >If I need to apologize, then I do apologize.
Your nonapology is greatly accepted.
Somewhere there is even a JSH simulator too, back, way back in the past, years and years ago.......... somewhere.....
( the above post originally was written by Tristan Tarza about 1910 where "Petry" was substituted for "DADA", a movement now coming back into vogue in the media, babbling )



