Le 02.04.2013 22:10, WM a écrit : > On 2 Apr., 00:25, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Apr 1, 11:08 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: >> >>> On 1 Apr., 17:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 27, 8:55 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: >> >>>>> Matheology § 233 >> >>>>> The set of all termination decimals is a subset of Q. If the set of >>>>> all terminating decimals of the unit interval is arranged as set of >>>>> all terminating paths of the decimal tree, >> >>>> It is, of course, impossible to write this out >>>> (the number of terminating decimals is infinite). >> >>> But >> >> Nope, no new arguments before you concede that >> the bit about not being able to write stuff out >> was nonsense > > Again you confuse different infinities! > It is nonsense to claim the existence of all bits or digits of an > actually infinite sequence of bits or digits. > It is correct to claim the existence of every bit or digit of an > infinite sequence that is defined by a finite formula such that every > bit or digit in principle can be determined in finite time. (Potential > infinity.) > > Regards, WM
Oh my God! WM is posting something stupid on the Internet, should I reply?