Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 233
Replies: 20   Last Post: Apr 4, 2013 10:16 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,381
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted: Apr 3, 2013 1:43 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 2 Apr., 23:46, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > > Nevertheless Cantor has given a finite formula to construct the list
> > > > of all rationals between 0 and 1. From that formula we can find every
> > > > entry and the anti-diagonal up to every digit d_n. From that we can
> > > > easily prove that for every FIS d_1, d_2, ..., d_n of d there are
> > > > infinitely many rationals with the same FISs. For every finite number
> > > > n - and there are no other lines than such enumerated with a finite
> > > > number!

>
> > > But as there is no end to the set/list of natural/finite numbers, there
> > > is also no end to the set/list of such lines.

>
> > What shall that "argument" be good for?
>
> WM is continually claiming


Here ordinary set theory is scrutinized.
Is the above observation correct in set theory or not?

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.