
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted:
Apr 3, 2013 1:43 AM


On 2 Apr., 23:46, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > Nevertheless Cantor has given a finite formula to construct the list > > > > of all rationals between 0 and 1. From that formula we can find every > > > > entry and the antidiagonal up to every digit d_n. From that we can > > > > easily prove that for every FIS d_1, d_2, ..., d_n of d there are > > > > infinitely many rationals with the same FISs. For every finite number > > > > n  and there are no other lines than such enumerated with a finite > > > > number! > > > > But as there is no end to the set/list of natural/finite numbers, there > > > is also no end to the set/list of such lines. > > > What shall that "argument" be good for? > > WM is continually claiming
Here ordinary set theory is scrutinized. Is the above observation correct in set theory or not?
Regards, WM

