The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Brownian motion sample path: fake or genuine?
Replies: 7   Last Post: Apr 3, 2013 8:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David C. Ullrich

Posts: 3,555
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Brownian motion sample path: fake or genuine?
Posted: Apr 3, 2013 9:40 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 03:17:45 -0400, David Bernier
<> wrote:

>I used snow (white noise) from an analog cathode ray tube TV,
>recorded with a webcam, as the source of entropy for supposedly
>random bits.
>I had 1.8 gigabytes of digital video, which I
>whittled down to about 2.5 megabytes of "random bits".
>16384 Bernoulli(1205, 1/2) r.v.s were generated,
>with k in {0, ... 1205} associated
>to the #0 s minus #1s : 2k-1205 in
>the range {-1205, -1203, ... -1, 1, 3, 5, ... 1203, 1205}.
>This number, 2k-1205, stood in for a Gaussian r.v. of
>mean zero. The result was a random walk with steps
>of +1 and -1, sampled every 1205 steps;
>16384 samples were taken, without counting
>x(0) = 0 [starting point].
>16384*1205 = 19,742,720 (bits) or 2,467,840 bytes.
>The graphic drawn with MatLab is here:
>Maybe it's a fake, not random.
>I don't know ...

You don't say so explicitly, but it sounds as though
you feel that the picture looks wrong somehow.
It looks like Brownian motion to me - what seems
to be the problem? (Maybe I'm missing your point...)

>David Bernier

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.