The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Brownian motion sample path: fake or genuine?
Replies: 7   Last Post: Apr 3, 2013 8:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David Bernier

Posts: 3,892
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Brownian motion sample path: fake or genuine?
Posted: Apr 3, 2013 3:35 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 04/03/2013 10:48 AM, David Bernier wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 3:17:45 AM UTC-4, David Bernier wrote:
>>> I used snow (white noise) from an analog cathode ray tube TV,
>>> recorded with a webcam, as the source of entropy for supposedly


>>> The graphic drawn with MatLab is here:
>>> Maybe it's a fake, not random.


>> It looks like BM to me too. Do some tests for independent increments
>> and normality of increments over 50 (say) points.

> I guess my aim is perfection here ...
> My major (and lasting) concern
> is that 1205 random coin tosses, used to generate
> a displacement from -1205 to 1205 (odd integer values only),
> is not exactly a Gaussian random variable.
> The second concern is bugs in the "bit-extractor",
> and samples-generating C code,
> for the 2,468,800-byte file.

I used chunks of 32 bytes to get blocks of 256 random bits,
interpreted as a sample from a uniform distribution on
[0, 1].

I used the Box-Muller method to transform pairs
of uniform variates into pairs of standard normal,
independent, variates:
< > .

Thus, the result is 77,150 independent standard normal variates.

I'm wondering if *.png graphics files might look better
than *.jpg files ... I made them both, brown1 and brown2,
with MatLab on an off-line computer with Windows 2000.

Sample path #2:

< >

At t = 77,150, we're at about -1.8 standard deviations.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.