Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: combining Titius Bode Rule with orbital speeds to yield Solid Body
Rotation of Solar System Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1462 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 10   Last Post: Apr 5, 2013 7:19 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Posts: 18,572 Registered: 3/31/08
220/47 = 4.68 years for a revolution of the Sun's gravity cell
Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1466 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Apr 5, 2013 2:48 AM

On Apr 5, 1:04 am, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The worlds first computer-- Antikythera Mechanism
> may lead to the clue of the Solar System solid body rotation.
>
> Now I saw that NOVA show yesterday and remember something about the
> Moon's orbit is a perturbed orbit of a rotation that follows a 9 year
> cycle and researchers wondered if the mechanism accounted for the
> perturbation. Turns out, if my memory is correct that 26.5 teeth would
> solve that perturbation and thus a 53 prime number teeth.
>
> Now, possibly, the 9 years is the crucial time period for the Sun
> gravity-cell to make a complete solid body rotation about its axis.
>
> So where Archimedes of Ancient Greek science figured out and developed
> and built the world's first computer, may be helping out Archimedes
> the second in 2013 in figuring out the solid body rotation rate of the
> Solar System. (Of course I believe I am the reincarnation of
> Archimedes the first).
>
> So, let me look at this 9 year cycle of where the Moon gets its
> rebirth in a new orbit. So that the entire Solar System, out to the
> Oort Cloud is spinning on an axis that has 1 complete revolution in
> 9 years.
>
> I suppose we cannot make a Antikythera Mechanism that has the planets
> revolving around the Sun instead of Earth, and that has the Sun moving
> in 220km/sec (in scale) while Earth is moving only
> 29km/sec and Jupiter only 13km/sec.
>
> So that we would need one huge gear wheel with a large number of teeth
> that makes null the Sun's 220km/sec and keeps the planets in a stable
> orbit around the Sun.
>
> The NOVA program showed a English engineer that builds antikythera
> boxes, perhaps he could design one which shows the planets and their
> orbital speeds and what type of spin axis to nullify the 220km/sec
> yet keep the planets all in orbit and the Sun not wandering off.
>

Two thoughts before I stop on this tonight. First, it has to be a
faster spin speed than a 9 year
complete revolution of the Sun's gravity cell out to the Oort Cloud.
It has to be faster than 9 years because the most critical planet is
Mercury so close to the Sun and although Mercury is orbiting with a
speed of 47km/sec the Sun's 220km/sec would quickly disrupt and make
unstable that orbit unless the rotation of the gravity cell was there
to prevent disruption with a full revolution in something like 5 years
where 220/47 = 4.68 years rather than 9 years.

And also, there is a deep mystery as to why Neptune and Pluto seemed
to have been planet and satellite and that Neptune is wandering away
or into the region of Uranus. Can we have planets wandering away from
their orbits in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity? Of course
not. But in EM-gravity, the gravity cell set up by the Sun starts to
make planetary orbits the further out from the Sun become more
temporary and has those outer planets wandering in closer to the other
planets.

So if the Spin axis of the Sun gravity cell is 4.68 years for a
complete revolution, then Neptune a planet once in the orbit of Pluto
was forced to wander innerward to that of Uranus.

So to check if 220/47 is the correct time for one complete revolution
of the Sun's gravity cell, we have to see if it predicts Mercury and
predicts Neptune's penchant for wandering closer to Uranus. For it is
solid body rotation and that rotation adds a lot to the outermost
planets.
--

for AP. It functions well for David Bernier in Google but Google
apparently is prejudicial to AP which has stopped functioning, and
maybe a sign that a Google employee is eliminating the archive of AP.
If Google can function properly for David Bernier in a author-archive,
but not AP is troublesome. And no silly explanation of "indexing" but
rather what is going on is vandalism.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair
archiving of AP author posts for the past several years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies