On Apr 5, 1:04 am, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote: > The worlds first computer-- Antikythera Mechanism > may lead to the clue of the Solar System solid body rotation. > > Now I saw that NOVA show yesterday and remember something about the > Moon's orbit is a perturbed orbit of a rotation that follows a 9 year > cycle and researchers wondered if the mechanism accounted for the > perturbation. Turns out, if my memory is correct that 26.5 teeth would > solve that perturbation and thus a 53 prime number teeth. > > Now, possibly, the 9 years is the crucial time period for the Sun > gravity-cell to make a complete solid body rotation about its axis. > > So where Archimedes of Ancient Greek science figured out and developed > and built the world's first computer, may be helping out Archimedes > the second in 2013 in figuring out the solid body rotation rate of the > Solar System. (Of course I believe I am the reincarnation of > Archimedes the first). > > So, let me look at this 9 year cycle of where the Moon gets its > rebirth in a new orbit. So that the entire Solar System, out to the > Oort Cloud is spinning on an axis that has 1 complete revolution in > 9 years. > > I suppose we cannot make a Antikythera Mechanism that has the planets > revolving around the Sun instead of Earth, and that has the Sun moving > in 220km/sec (in scale) while Earth is moving only > 29km/sec and Jupiter only 13km/sec. > > So that we would need one huge gear wheel with a large number of teeth > that makes null the Sun's 220km/sec and keeps the planets in a stable > orbit around the Sun. > > The NOVA program showed a English engineer that builds antikythera > boxes, perhaps he could design one which shows the planets and their > orbital speeds and what type of spin axis to nullify the 220km/sec > yet keep the planets all in orbit and the Sun not wandering off. >
Two thoughts before I stop on this tonight. First, it has to be a faster spin speed than a 9 year complete revolution of the Sun's gravity cell out to the Oort Cloud. It has to be faster than 9 years because the most critical planet is Mercury so close to the Sun and although Mercury is orbiting with a speed of 47km/sec the Sun's 220km/sec would quickly disrupt and make unstable that orbit unless the rotation of the gravity cell was there to prevent disruption with a full revolution in something like 5 years where 220/47 = 4.68 years rather than 9 years.
And also, there is a deep mystery as to why Neptune and Pluto seemed to have been planet and satellite and that Neptune is wandering away or into the region of Uranus. Can we have planets wandering away from their orbits in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity? Of course not. But in EM-gravity, the gravity cell set up by the Sun starts to make planetary orbits the further out from the Sun become more temporary and has those outer planets wandering in closer to the other planets.
So if the Spin axis of the Sun gravity cell is 4.68 years for a complete revolution, then Neptune a planet once in the orbit of Pluto was forced to wander innerward to that of Uranus.
So to check if 220/47 is the correct time for one complete revolution of the Sun's gravity cell, we have to see if it predicts Mercury and predicts Neptune's penchant for wandering closer to Uranus. For it is solid body rotation and that rotation adds a lot to the outermost planets. --
Google author-archive stopped functioning properly by about ?May 2012 for AP. It functions well for David Bernier in Google but Google apparently is prejudicial to AP which has stopped functioning, and maybe a sign that a Google employee is eliminating the archive of AP. If Google can function properly for David Bernier in a author-archive, but not AP is troublesome. And no silly explanation of "indexing" but rather what is going on is vandalism.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP author posts for the past several years as seen here: