Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: combining Titius Bode Rule with orbital speeds to yield Solid Body
Rotation of Solar System Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1462 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 10   Last Post: Apr 5, 2013 7:19 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 9,368
Registered: 3/31/08
70 days for a complete Solar gravity cell rotation Chapt16.15 Gravity
Cells #1467 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Apr 5, 2013 5:07 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Sorry, not my last post of the day, I made an error in the above,
well, two successive errors. First I contemplated the Sun gravity cell
to spin in rotation taking 9 years, then the next mistake was to think
that it could be 220/47 = 4.68 years. But at least I got something
correct in that I must focus on Mercury for the spin rotation of Sun's
gravity cell.

Now the Sun itself spins on its axis one complete turn in 25 days and
the orbit of Mercury takes 88 days for one complete turn.

So here is the problem in graphic detail. The Sun moves at 220km/sec
in space in a linear line and Mercury moves in space in a linear line
at 47 km/sec which means that Newtonian gravity and General Relativity
cannot possibly hold Mercury in a stable orbit for the Sun would
quickly move away from Mercury leaving it behind. So how would EM-
gravity solve the problem? By recognizing a Sun gravity cell that
extends from the Solar axis out into space and that this cell spins
itself which would nullify the 220km/sec speed but would enhance the
speed of Mercury by adding on a curvature speed since Space around the
Sun is spinning.

Now what would be the period of a full turn of the Solar gravity cell?
It would not be 9 years because the Sun would have escaped Mercury and
left it far behind. It would not be 220/47 years for that would also
leave Mercury far behind.

The spin period must be somewhere between that of 25 days and 88 days.
It cannot be 88 days because Mercury has a nonzero speed of 47km/sec
about 1/5 that of the Sun. So it must be somewhere around 4/5 of 88
days which is 70 days for a complete Solar gravity cell turn on its
axis.

Now a gravity cell turning on its axis is Space itself that is
spinning and is solid body rotation. So that if we add this 70 day
spin to the planet Jupiter of its 13km/sec, it augments the Jupiter
orbit so that it remains gravitationally locked to the Sun.

So let me sleep on that for night, although I think I still have
errors in this.

--
Google author-archive stopped functioning properly by about?May 2012
for AP. It functions well for David Bernier in Google but Google
apparently is prejudicial to AP which has stopped functioning, and
maybe a sign that a Google employee is eliminating the archive of AP.
If Google can function properly for David Bernier in a author-
archive, ?but not AP is troublesome. And no silly explanation of
"indexing" but?rather what is going on is vandalism.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair
archiving of AP author posts for the past several years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


Date Subject Author
4/4/13
Read combining Titius Bode Rule with orbital speeds to yield Solid Body
Rotation of Solar System Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1462 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/4/13
Read why the common geometry in astronomy is disc shaped Chapt16.15
Gravity Cells #1463 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/4/13
Read why the 2 most common shapes of astronomy are disc and ball
Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1464 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read NOVA's Antikythera Mechanism applied to Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.15
Gravity Cells #1465 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read 220/47 = 4.68 years for a revolution of the Sun's gravity cell
Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1466 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read 70 days for a complete Solar gravity cell rotation Chapt16.15 Gravity
Cells #1467 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read Re: NOVA's Antikythera Mechanism applied to Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.15
Gravity Cells #1465 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
pete
4/5/13
Read Re: NOVA's Antikythera Mechanism applied to Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.15
Gravity Cells #1465 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Sam Wormley
4/5/13
Read Re: NOVA's Antikythera Mechanism applied to Sun's 220km/sec
Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1465 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Brian Q. Hutchings
4/5/13
Read open challenge to Michael Wright Re: NOVA's Antikythera Mechanism
applied to Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1471 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read Re: open challenge to Michael Wright Re: NOVA's Antikythera Mechanism applied to Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1471 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
bacle

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.