The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.matlab

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: fsolve - premature and stalled
Replies: 2   Last Post: Apr 10, 2013 7:28 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Alan Weiss

Posts: 1,430
Registered: 11/27/08
Re: fsolve - premature and stalled
Posted: Apr 5, 2013 7:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 4/4/2013 8:59 AM, KUNHEE wrote:
> I apologize. I am so sorry. I should have told you the initial problem.
> When I first tried, it did not give me a solution and showed:
> "No solution found.
> fsolve stopped because the relative size of the current step is less
> than the
> selected value of the step size tolerance squared, but the vector of
> function values
> is not near zero as measured by the selected value of the function
> tolerance."
> This problem was overcome by reducing the number of meshes, which
> might have caused the inaccurate results.
> Do you have any idea how to solve this problem? or why it does not
> want to give me a solution?
> Thank you so much for your help,
> Kunhee Lee

I feel that I came in somewhere in the middle of a conversation. You
talk about incompressible fluids, graphs, meshes, and time steps, none
of which have anything to do with fsolve as far as I know.

So, if you don't mind, I'll restrict my comments to fsolve issues.

There can be many reasons why fsolve does not reach a solution. Some
suggestions are listed here:

If your objective function vector is the result of a simulation or
solution to an ODE, then fsolve can have trouble because of difficulties
in estimating derivatives. See

It is possible that you are integrating a function whose value is given
by an fsolve solution. In that case, it is usually a good idea to use
the starting point for fsolve at the next time step in the integration
as the previous fsolve solution. Usually, solutions don't change much as
you vary time. But, of course, you can hit a point where this procedure
does not work, and then you have to look all over for a good starting point.

Good luck,

Alan Weiss
MATLAB mathematical toolbox documentation

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.