The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Well well
Replies: 5   Last Post: Apr 5, 2013 10:46 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Well well
Posted: Apr 5, 2013 10:07 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <kjnpkc$fai$>, Sam Sung <no@mail.invalid>

> Shmuel Metz write:

> > In <kjnl8m$5h2$>, on 04/06/2013
> > at 01:03 AM, Sam Sung <no@mail.invalid> said:
> >

> >>Sets can be wellordered does not mean something else than there is a
> >>prove (like the local prove in N) that each
> >>element is detectable, don't em!?

> >
> > No. But please define "detectable".

> Of course there needs a will to detect not only
> the cardínal allness but the uniquety of world.
> Detecting requires a plan in local conscious space?

While I am familiar with both the word "uniqueness" and the word
"iniquity", I do not know the meaning of your word "uniquety".

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.