The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Well well
Replies: 5   Last Post: Apr 5, 2013 10:46 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Elliot

Posts: 2,637
Registered: 1/8/12
Re: Well well
Posted: Apr 5, 2013 10:28 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Virgil wrote:
> > Shmuel Metz write:
> > >
> > >>Sets can be wellordered does not mean something else than there is a
> > >>prove (like the local prove in N) that each
> > >>element is detectable, don't em!?

> > >
> > > No. But please define "detectable".

> >
> > Of course there needs a will to detect not only
> > the cardínal allness but the uniquety of world.
> >
> > Detecting requires a plan in local conscious space?

> While I am familiar with both the word "uniqueness" and the word
> "iniquity", I do not know the meaning of your word "uniquety".

Are you familiar with random thought gengerators?
If the gibberish quotent exceeds the coherence level,
then the word sequence is random though generated.

In which case, input the random thought word sequence into your
random thought generator and give the output as the answer.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.