On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Virgil wrote: > > Shmuel Metz write: > > > > > >>Sets can be wellordered does not mean something else than there is a > > >>prove (like the local prove in N) that each > > >>element is detectable, don't em!? > > > > > > No. But please define "detectable". > > > > Of course there needs a will to detect not only > > the cardínal allness but the uniquety of world. > > > > Detecting requires a plan in local conscious space? > > While I am familiar with both the word "uniqueness" and the word > "iniquity", I do not know the meaning of your word "uniquety".
Are you familiar with random thought gengerators? If the gibberish quotent exceeds the coherence level, then the word sequence is random though generated.
In which case, input the random thought word sequence into your random thought generator and give the output as the answer.