On Apr 6, 12:53 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 6 Apr., 11:41, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > How do you call a set E the number of elements exceeds any given > > > > > natural number? > > > > > E is a finite subset, thus the number of elements in E > > > > equals some given finite number (we do not know which > > > > finite number > > > > Very interesting! You have my full support. Now there remains only a > > > little step to do. Since you cannot find anything that is in D but not > > > in E, we can extend your enlightenment: > > > |N is a finite set. > > > nope > > ?
We are not in Wolkenmuekenheim.
In Wolkenmuekenheim we have the very intuitive idea that there is an unfindable line that changes all the time and may not be the same for two different people that is the largest element of |N.
Outside Wolkenmuekenheim we have the unintuitive idea that |N does not have a largest element. |N is an infinite set of finite elements.