On 4/7/2013 11:54 AM, Nam Nguyen wrote: > > Not sure I understand what you'd like to convey here, but > "standard" is a relativistic term, by Principle (3). >
Since you choose to debate in this fashion,
My meta-meta "standard" always applies critically to your meta "principle 3"
You are more than welcome to make silly claims that your meta-meta-meta "principle 3" always defeats my meta-meta "standard"
What is not relativistic is the possiblity of syntactic proof for unproven statements in the standard, accepted axioms which give community meaning to the expression "Peano Arithmetic". Your formulation of principles justifying your apparent positions does not seem to respect this fact.
It may, although I doubt it. But discerning that would require reasonable discussion.
I concede that you have a winning strategy.
I pre-concede that you will always have a winning strategy.