Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 238
Replies: 210   Last Post: Apr 13, 2013 4:21 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 238
Posted: Apr 7, 2013 5:44 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<dbd27fa8-60c8-40d4-a922-5525ad10a1b5@o9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 7 Apr., 12:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 12:29 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > On 6 Apr., 23:17, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Apr 6, 11:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On 6 Apr., 22:30, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > My claim is:
> >
> > > > > >     Let D be the set of all lines, and let
> > > > > >     E be any one finite subset of D.
> > > > > >     Then D\E is not empty.

> >
> > > > > Your claim is true.
> >
> > > > I also claim: Let D be the set of all
> > > > lines, then if you remove any one finite
> > > > subset of D there is something left.

> >
> > Do you accept this claim?
> > Yes or no.-

>
> Of course. Yes. But what has it to do with the fact that either D is
> more than all its FISs


Does WM claim that D is NOT equal to the union of the set of all its
FISs?





> (then all lines of our list can be removed
> without removing |N and Cantor's proof fails), or not, then Cantor's
> proof holds and my counter proof holds too, since then all FISOns
> include the union over all FISONs.


Wm does not have a "counterproof" to the CDA (Cantor's diaganal
argument). What he claims to be a counterproof is an irrelevancy.

This is the "theorem" that WM claims disproves the CDA (Cantor Diagoanal
Argument):

WM's Theorem: Consider a list that contains a complete sequence (q_k) of
all rational numbers q_k. The first n digits of the anti-diagonal d are
d_1, d_2, d_3, ..., d_n. It can be shown *for every n* that the
Cantor-list beyond line n contains infinitely many rational numbers q_k
thathave the same sequence of first n digits as the anti-diagonal d.

In the first place, unless those rationals are restricted to
non-negative proper fractions, each expansion will have to allow for
both a sign and a radix point, as well as digits.

And it is extrememly unlikely that, even with sucht restrictions, the
"anti-diagonal" will be a rational.
And since it only deals with rationlas, and neither reals not binary
sequnces, it can say nothing about either sequnces of reals or sequences
of binary sequnces.

And finally, the diagonal as specified by WM is with probabl;ility 1
going to be irratinal, not rational.

And generally, it is easily seen to be the claim of a mathemtaical
incompetent.
>
> But in no case Cantor's argument remains valid.


In no case has WM shown that Cantor's argument is other than valid.


> In
> order to maintain Cantor's argument


One need only stay out of Wolkenmuekenheim.
--




Date Subject Author
4/6/13
Read Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Tanu R.
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
William Hughes
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Tanu R.
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/12/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
dan.ms.chaos@gmail.com
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
dan.ms.chaos@gmail.com
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/11/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/9/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Tanu R.
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Tanu R.
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/8/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/7/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
namducnguyen
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
namducnguyen
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology � 238
Virgil
4/6/13
Read Re: Matheology § 238
fom

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.