Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 238
Posted:
Apr 8, 2013 5:41 PM
|
|
In article
<756f5483-8e87-4a67-bda4-3be127d9554f@e13g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 8 Apr., 17:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 4:42 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 8 Apr., 16:27, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Apr 8, 4:09 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On 8 Apr., 15:24, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Let D be the collection of all finite lines.
>
> The collection is an infinite sequence of unions, because every line
> is the union of all its predecessors and itself.
Unless each line is merely a set, then it cannot be merely a union.
But each line has far more structure than merely being set.
--
|
|
