Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: some amateurish opinions on CH
Posted:
Apr 8, 2013 5:46 PM
|
|
In article
<c7455a81-3df0-4e85-a866-97d81a739ed5@cm2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 8 Apr., 10:59, Dan <dan.ms.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, in "standard set theory" we also have uncountable sets .
> > Judging by your history on sci.math , you shouldn't be using "standard
> > set theory" as an argument .
>
> I use it as it is in order to contradict it.
Except that WM tries to impose his own spin on everything, a spin that
does not apply anywhere outside of Wolkenmuekenheim.
Also, WM is extremely sloppy with the use of many mathematical terms
which have, at least outside of Wolkenmuekenheim, precise definitions.
>
> I am not interested in attempts to save it, since every such attempt
> will unavoidably lead to failure on another point, like a tablecloth
> that is too short to cover the table. The idea of finished infinity is
> insane. It cannot be saved.
It will long outlive WM.
--
|
|
