
Re: Then answer to Frege's two objections to formalism.
Posted:
Apr 9, 2013 7:56 AM


On Apr 6, 8:34 am, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 5, 2:25 pm, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So: > > > Mathematics is about analytics fictional or real, most interestingly > > those in proximity with reality. > > > Zuhair > > It is interesting to investigate the say metaphysical basis for this > virtualreal proximity. The psychological basis are clear, as any > fiction it wont go viral unless it meets some demands that many people > share. The pervasiveness of applicability of mathematics can be seen > to be due to mathematicians limiting their logically driven virtual > reality to mimic pervasive relations and properties throughout the > physical universe, as I said for example an investigation of Part > whole relation and Connectedness would be of course expected to have > pervasive applications wide across, since every scientific discipline > would encounter such relations. Similarly the study of a relation like > membership and collections would definitely have pervasive > applications, because those relations are already pervasive. Truly the > mathematical study of those relations puts them under harsh strict > rule guidance in a fictional world starting from premises that do > possess high proximity to what is thought of them to be in the real > world, the so called "naturalness" of those axioms, such conditions > can be argued that the real world need not imitate or follow so > harshly as regards those relations, but still it is the case that > studying those pervasive relations cannot really be contemplated > otherwise, and analytics of those relations under those harsh strict > virtual grounds had been proved over time to be useful in > understanding them in the real world! which mean that there is some > connection between the logically driven fictional world and the real > world they are approximating. However one to understand that this > connection might not be identical the fictional world only PROXIMATE > the reals world, and of course some fictional processing might lead us > astray from the real world happenings but the error is small to be > significant from the practical stand point. What are the metaphysics > of that connection deserves to be studied. > > So interesting mathematics can be understood as: Pervasive analytics > real or fictional. > > If we redefine virtual to be real or proximal fictional, then > mathematics in the interesting sense burns down to > > Pervasive virtual analytics. > > So at the end here I've presented the answers to Freges' objections to > formalism which are the main ones I understand. > > Zuhair
Arguably the most interesting game is the one in which all proximal games are interpreted provided having high possibility of being consistent or near consistent.

