Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: 0.9999... = 1 that means mathematics ends in contradiction
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 15, 2014 3:42 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 JT Posts: 1,448 Registered: 4/7/12
Re: show the cannonical base-one digital representation not God-am
hashmarks thank you don't do it again <endquote>

Posted: Apr 10, 2013 7:52 PM

On 11 Apr, 00:35, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 Apr, 21:07, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>

> > see Stevin's _The Decimals_ for the ambguous case in odometermath,
> > cannonically: ...0001.0000... defined isomorphic to ...0000.9999...

>
> Why don't you like the hashmarks it is afterall what your dreamed up
> numberline is made of, and YOU have to partition it to make any sense.
> Since the reals is not baseless, but fractions are.
>
> If you wanted to represent a binary 5 as 101 ={{{1111}}1} that just
> will grove weirder with the number of zeros because there is no
> decomposition into the base, just a freaking huge collection that may
> or may not be a square.
>
> Counting base 1   5={1,1,1,1,1}
> Binary            5={{1,1}{1,1}1}
> Ternary           5={{1,1,1}1,1}
> Quaternary        5={{1,1,1,1}1}
> Senary            5={1,1,1,1,1}
> Septenary         5={1,1,1,1,1}
> Octal             5={1,1,1,1,1}
> Nonary            5={1,1,1,1,1}
> Decimal           5={1,1,1,1,1}
>
> I have not thought about representing base1(unary?) fractionals
> becase
> fractionals is superior to partitioning into base, but possible .{1}
> for 1/3 and 3/9 .{{1,1,1}  9/27 .{{{1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1} what do you
> think.

Ternarys if anyone in doubt...

This is the true nature of numbers collections and cuts, the
> number line is just dreamed up. Numbers are baseless we partition and
> create the semantics the collections is interpretated in, not the
> other way around. And i show you the simples semantics for numbers.
> Collections and cuts.
>

Ternarys if anyone in doubt..
> I have not thru about howto represent base1(unary?) fractionals
> becase
> fractionals is superior to partitioning into base, but possible .{1}
> for 1/3 and 3/9 .{{1,1,1}  9/27 .{{{1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1} what do you
> think.
>
> Do you have any problem interpretate this numbersystem, in reality
> though there are better representations more compact. But they are all
> without zeros and bijective.

Date Subject Author
4/10/13 byron
4/10/13 Jens Stuckelberger
4/10/13 bacle
4/10/13 William Hughes
4/10/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
4/10/13 JT
4/10/13 JT
4/10/13 JT
4/10/13 JT
4/10/13 JT
4/10/13 JT
4/12/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
4/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
4/10/13 JT
4/11/13 JT
1/8/14 byron
1/8/14 Pfsszxt@aol.com
1/8/14 Brian Q. Hutchings
1/8/14 William Hughes
1/9/14 DrMWEcker
2/12/14 Port563
2/12/14 thenewcalculus@gmail.com
2/12/14 Brian Q. Hutchings
2/14/14 thenewcalculus@gmail.com
2/15/14 Brian Q. Hutchings