In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 10 Apr., 22:33, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 4/10/2013 3:00 PM, WM wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > In fact I can use induction to show that actual infinity is nonsense: > > > > Yes. But, you must do it for each and every > > mathematical statement individually. > > No. Actual infinity or finished infinity need not be treated > separately in separate cases. It is simply an insane approach.
In that case, WM must necessarily have given up all mathematics that involves liming processes, all of which assume infiniteness is actual.
> That is a psychological problem and > cannot be cured by mathematics.
WM's certainly is.
If actual infiniteness is a problem to WM, perhaps he ought to take up some area of study in which it is less firmly established as the standard than it is in current mathematics. --