In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 12 Apr., 08:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Now let P be (can remove the collection without changing > > the union of the remaining lines). We have there is no > > contradiction in saying A: for all n, the nth line can be removed > > because A does not imply C and only C is a contraction. > > No, we have that not. And you have never given any evidence for your > unsubstantiated claim, than repeating it.
He is merely following your lead in that respect. > > Cantor uses the contrary. He proves A (every line l_n =/= d) and > claims to have proved C (all lines are =/= d).
In order to falsify the claim every line is different from the antidiagonal you must show how some line can be NO different from the antidiagonal, which you have not done and cannot so.
Even if it were possible to do, WM is not enough of a mathematician to do it. --