On 4/12/2013 3:10 AM, WM wrote: > On 12 Apr., 08:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Now let P be (can remove the collection without changing >> the union of the remaining lines). We have there is no >> contradiction in saying A: for all n, the nth line can be removed >> because A does not imply C and only C is a contraction. > > No, we have that not. And you have never given any evidence for your > unsubstantiated claim, than repeating it. >
Actually, it is not about evidence.
WH argues from an established body of principles.
There are alternatives and ways to argue from those alternatives. But, WM will have none of that.
WM argues from nothing except his beliefs based on personal subjective reality and his "will" to draw monotonic inclusive sequences of crayon marks.