On Apr 12, 10:10 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 12 Apr., 08:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Now let P be (can remove the collection without changing > > the union of the remaining lines). We have there is no > > contradiction in saying A: for all n, the nth line can be removed > > because A does not imply C and only C is a contraction. > > No, we have that not. And you have never given any evidence for your > unsubstantiated claim, than repeating it.
You have things the wrong way round. We have agreed that in general knowing that something is true for every element of a collection does not show it is true for the collection that is A does not imply C. It is up to you to provide evidence that in this case A does imply C. (This will be difficult as we have an example showing that in this case A does not imply C)