Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards organizes the high school mathematics standards into grade-by-grade courses. NYSED had indicated that they chose the traditional path. At another time it was indicated that NYSED would be following the PARCC frameworks. The frameworks for the high school courses are being developed.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Peggy Niforos Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 9:37 AM To: email@example.com Subject: RE: Differences in the curriculum
I would like to point out the need to READ THE FOOTNOTES on the engageNY document. The footnotes differentiate what is in Algebra 1 and Algebra 2 curriculum when a standard is shared.
I know people tend to ignore things like that, so that's why I'm mentioning it.
________________________________ From: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:21:09 -0400 Subject: Re: Differences in the curriculum To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Gene, I think your comment sums up what I am actually looking for. (Standards that are specific for each course!) "actually creating a standard that is specific for each course (which would have been the most helpful choice)." I work in a very small school middle school (I am the only teacher for Integrated Algebra in the middle school) and would love to see the specific standards that others are using. If anyone is willing to share theirs with me I would be so appreciative!!!
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Gene Jordan <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>> wrote: I was slowly working on that as well, and for me the hard part of the new Algebra curriculum is distinguishing the assessment limits for those dual-standards that are taught in both courses. The document linked has that information laid out in the clearest way, short of actually creating a standard that is specific for each course (which would have been the most helpful choice).
From: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>] On Behalf Of JDiletti@akronschools.org<mailto:JDiletti@akronschools.org> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 8:16 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Subject: Re: Differences in the curriculum
I was just working on this yesterday. This link is the PARCC Framework document that lists the modules, importance of them and changes from Appendix A
From: Elise Teitelbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> Date: 04/12/2013 07:46 AM Subject: Differences in the curriculum Sent by: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> ________________________________
Can anybody tell me what is in the new Integrated Algebra curriculum (for the 2014 test) that is not in the curriculum for the this year's exam?
Are there more topics that need to be covered prior to next year's early June exam compared to the topics that need to be covered for this year's mid June exam.
Is there a site that I can access to see the differences? ________________________________
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is intended for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This message may contain confidential student or personnel data or an attorney-client communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message and any attached documents in error, that any review, dissemination/disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and documents. Thank you for your cooperation.