In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 13 Apr., 19:34, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > WM usually deletes whatever challenges that > > would require an accounting of his statements > > more substantial than > > > > | > > || > > ||| > > |||| > > You have forgotten the important three points
While fom may have forgotten much, he, at least, at one time knew it, something that WM fails at.
WM's latest ex cathedra is that a strictly increasing infinite sequence having a limit may contain that limit as a term of the sequence. --