In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 13 Apr., 11:46, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 4/13/2013 4:06 AM, WM wrote: >
> > > > >> WM's finite existence hypothesis. > > Not a hypothesis, but the fundament of science.
But not of mathematics. Pure mathematics is largely independent of such restriction.
> > > > The fact that WM needs mathematics to be grounded in a metaphysical > > reality merely reflects the poverty of his philosophy. > > Mathematics is done in reality without any metaphysical touch.
May be WM's is, though on consideration , WM's math seems furthrer from any sort of reality than that of the purest of mathematicians. > > > > > WM has apparently ties his self-worth to the chicken scratch > > and crayon marks he calls a reality (Oh, it should be granted > > that he found a publisher for his books. > > One of them printed in seventh edition, another one in third, even a > best seller.