The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Delta functions.
Replies: 14   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 8:58 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Waldek Hebisch

Posts: 267
Registered: 12/8/04
Re: Delta functions.
Posted: Apr 15, 2013 5:12 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

D Herring <> wrote:
> On 04/13/2013 12:02 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > Using delta functions can lead to problems with zero divisors.
> ...
> > which is clearly inconsistent. I wonder I there is any theory
> > how to avoid such problems? I mean, what CAS can do to
> > protect users from wrong results?

> The conservative approach is to disable simplifications where the CAS
> is unsure of their correctness. Inside an integral, it can be
> evaluated appropriately. Elsewhere, it should probably be preserved
> as-is.

Beside integrals one probably should evaluate delta functions in
few other contexts, like limits and explicit calls to simplify.
If you globally disable other simplification due to (possible)
presence of delta functions, then I am affraid that you get an
unusable CAS. OTOH if you simplify other parts of expression
then you get what Maple produced.

So it seems that you advocate for CAS to go on and let user
worry about possible problems if his/her actions trigger
evaluation at unfortunate point.

Waldek Hebisch

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.