Ralf Bader write: > fom wrote: >> On 4/17/2013 3:26 PM, WM wrote: >>> On 17 Apr., 21:41, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a line containing EVERY member of A? >>> >>> Is there a line containing every line of B? No. Nevertheless all lines >>> of B are FISONs. >> >> True. But this is only a contingent truth. >> >> For WM there is some maximum natural number >> which restricts one from interpreting his >> statement in the usual mathematical manner. >> >> For any given n, WM's statement can only >> be sensible if the associated triangular >> number does not exceed his maximum number. >> >> Why? >> >> WM is an unabashed ultrafinitist who refuses to fix >> a largest finite number. Each "n" in his description >> depends on the subsequence of triangular numbers. > > Read this piece of crap: > http://de.arxiv.org/abs/math/0505649 > And then answer the question, with explicit references to that document, why > it should make any sense to contemplate the views on mathematics of that > person. The only interesting question I can see is: What the hell has gone > wrong that so-called "homo sapiens" drowns in such nonsense?
Yes, WM is impertinent idiot because it always is commiting time theft.
